1 Meel, J. van (2015). Workplaces Today. ICOP Books. 25Engelen, L., Chau, J., Young, S., Mackey, M., Jeyapalan, D., & 2 Allen, T. J., & Gerstberger, P. G. (1973). A field experiment to improveBauman, A. (2018). Is activity-based working impacting health, communications in a product engineering department: Thework performance and perceptions? A systematic review. Building nonterritorial office. Human Factors, 15(5), 487-498. Research & Information, 1-12.3 Meel, J, van (2015). Workplaces Today. ICOP Books. 26De Been, I., Beijer, M., & Den Hollander, D. (2015, June). How to cope with dilemmas in activity-based work environments-results from 4 Becker, F. D. (1982). The successful office: How to create a workspaceuser-centred research. In Conference paper 14th EuroFM Research thats right for you. Addison-Wesley. Symposium. EuroFM research papers (1-10).5 Stone, P. J., & Luchetti, R. (1985). Your office is where you are.27 Leesman. (2017). The rise and rise of activity-based working: Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 102-117. Reshaping the physical, virtual and behavioural workspace. London: 6 Nathan, M., & Doyle, J. (2002). The State of the Office: The politicsLeesman. Retrieved from http://www.leesmanindex.com/The_and geography of working space. Industrial Society. Rise_and_Rise_of_Activity_Based_Working_Research_book.pdf7 Veldhoen, E. (2004). The art of working. Sdu Uitgevers. 28Montanari, A., Mascolo, C., Sailer, K., & Nawaz, S. (2017). Detecting emerging activity-based working traits through wearable 8 Duffy, F., & Powell, K. (1997). The new office. Conran Octopus. technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, 9 Nathan, M., & Doyle, J. (2002). The State of the Office: The politicsWearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(3), 86.and geography of working space. Industrial Society. 29Kim, J., Candido, C., Thomas, L., & de Dear, R. (2016). Desk 10 Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster. ownership in the workplace: The effect of non-territorial working on employee workplace satisfaction, perceived productivity and 11 NKB. 1978. Structure for Building Regulations, The Nordichealth. Building and Environment, 103, 203-214.Committee on Building Regulations (NKB), Report No. 34,30Bodin Danielsson, C., & Theorell, T. (2019). Office employees Stockholm perception of workspace contribution: A gender and office design 12 Essec Business School (2018), Mon bureau de demain, http:// perspective. Environment and Behavior, 51(9-10), 995-1026.workplace-management.essec.edu/mon-bureau-de-demain/ 31 Bakke, Jan Vilhelm (2019). Statsbyggs og Purenets nye veileder om mon-bureau-de-demain-iii kontorarbeidsplasser. Universiteitsavisa. Retrieved from: https://13 Cloud Booking (2018), Employee experience, the next stage ofwww.universitetsavisa.no/ytring/2019/10/09/Statsbyggs-og-evolution, https://cloudbooking.com/wp-content/uploads/ Purenets-nye-veileder-om-kontorarbeidsplasser-20127973.eceCloudbooking-White-Paper-Employee-Experience-%E2%80%93- 32Seddigh, A., Berntson, E., Danielson, C. B., & Westerlund, H. (2014). The-Next-Stage-of-the-Evolution.pdf Concentration requirements modify the effect of office type on 14 Gallup, Inc. (2017). State of the American Workplace. indicators of health and performance. Journal of environmental 15 International Workplace Group (2019), The IWG global workspacepsychology, 38, 167-174.survey - Welcome to Generation Flexthe employee power shift. 33Haapakangas, A., Hallman, D. M., Mathiassen, S. E., & Jahncke, 16 Rolf, L., Eklund, J., & Jahncke, H. (2018). Perceptions ofH. (2018). Self-rated productivity and employee well-being in performance and satisfaction after relocation to an activity-basedactivity-based offices: the role of environmental perceptions and office. Ergonomics, 61(5), 644-657. workspace use. Building and Environment, 145, 115-124.17 Candido, C., Zhang, J., Kim, J., deDear, R., Thomas, L. E., Strapasson,34Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., & Keulemans, P., & Joko, C. (2016, January). Impact of workspace layout onL. (2012). Do new ways of working foster work engagement? occupant satisfaction, perceived health and productivity. In:Psicothema, 24(1), 113120.Proceedings of 9th Windsor Conference: Making Comfort Relevant.35Rolf, L. V. (2018). Relocation to an activity-based flexible office: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings. Design processes and outcomes. Applied Ergonomics, 73, 141-150.18 Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Groenen, P., & Janssen, I. (2011). An end- 36Hoendervanger, J. G., De Been, I., Van Yperen, N. W., Mobach,users perspective on activity-based office concepts. Journal ofM. P., & Albers, C. J. (2016). Flexibility in use: Switching behaviour Corporate Real Estate, 13(2), 122-135. and satisfaction in activity-based work environments. Journal of 19 De Been, I., & Beijer, M. (2014). The influence of office type onCorporate Real Estate, 18(1), 48-62.satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of37 Fauconneau-Dufresne, S., Jemine, G., Pichault, F., & Rondeaux,Facilities Management, 12(2), 142-157. G. (2018). Beyond flexibility: confronting normative and lived 20Danielsson, C. B., & Bodin, L. (2008). Office type in relation tospaces of New Ways of Working. Proceedings of the 8th health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees.Organizations, Artifacts & Practices Conference. June 2018, Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 636-668. Amsterdam21 Benchmark data from 2019 from the Center for People and38Montanari, A., Mascolo, C., Sailer, K., & Nawaz, S. (2017). Detecting Buildings. Please note: benchmark measurements that are notemerging activity-based working traits through wearable directly related to the workplace concept (e.g. the accessibilitytechnology. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, of the building or its architectural expression) have not beenWearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(3), 86.included in this table. Source: https://www.cfpb.nl/media/uploads/ 39Wessels, C. (2017). Flexible Working Practices: How Employees file/20190328%20-%20Websitetekst%20CfPB%20Benchmark%20 Can Reap the Benefits for Engagement and Performance (Doctoral 2019%20herzien.pdf (Dutch) dissertation, Erasmus Research Institute of Management)22Pullen, W. (2014). Age, office type, job satisfaction and40Hoendervanger, J. G., De Been, I., Van Yperen, N. W., Mobach,performance. Work&Place, 3(2), 2014. M. P., & Albers, C. J. (2016). Flexibility in use: Switching behaviour 23Leesman. (2017). The rise and rise of activity-based working:and satisfaction in activity-based work environments. Journal of Reshaping the physical, virtual and behavioural workspace. London:Corporate Real Estate, 18(1), 48-62.Leesman. Retrieved from http://www.leesmanindex.com/The_ 41 Leesman. (2017). The rise and rise of activity-based working: Rise_and_Rise_of_Activity_Based_Working_Research_book.pdf Reshaping the physical, virtual and behavioural workspace. London: 24Ibid Leesman. Retrieved from http://www.leesmanindex.com/The_Rise_and_Rise_of_Activity_Based_Working_Research_book.pdf